Acosta v. Previte
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. In the procedural posture in which this proceeding comes to us we review questions of law only (CPLR 5501, subd [b]). Petitioners did not sustain their burden of proving the invalidity of the petition, either by proof of permeating fraud or of such other irregularities as to nullify it. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Stavisky v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Powell v. TendyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Blostein v. BauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Lepke v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Codd v. BarbaroNew York Supreme Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.