Kronenberger v. Heinemann
Appellate Court of Illinois
Bill to Foreclose a Trust Deed.—Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1901.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes
The decree of sale was final, from which an appeal or writ of error might have been prosecuted by Nicolaus Kronenberger in his lifetime, or by his heirs at law after his death. Kirby v. Runals, 140 Ill. 289-95; Cotes v. Bennett, 183Ill. 82-7; Patterson v. Patterson, 89 Ill. App. 406; 1st Starr & Curtis, Ch. 1, Sec. 12 and 24.
No question, however, is made as to the correctness of the decree of sale by plaintiffs in error. Their petition fails to allege but that they knew about the decree at the time it was rendered and of the subsequent proceedings set out in the statement at the times they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Kirby v. RunalsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Cotes v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Welch v. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
- Arentz v. ReillyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grieve v. HuberWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- Prouty v. MossAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
- Shields v. SorgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906