Legal Opinion

Coulter v. New Jersey Pulverizing Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 21, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*6The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The present actions were brought under the Death act. The defendant answered that the actions were barred by the statute of limitations. The plaintiffs moved to strike the answers and the defendant moved to strike the complaints. The defendant’s motion must be granted and the plaintiffs’ denied.

The question here presented is whether the representatives may sue under the Death act when their decedents’ right of action for the same negligence complained of in the action under the Death act was barred by limitations at the time of the decedents’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flynn v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Cooper v. Shore Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  3. Howard v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Soden v. Trenton and Mercer County Traction Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  5. Kelliher v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mason v. Gerin Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Lawlor v. Cloverleaf Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Alfone v. SarnoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  4. Silverman v. LathropNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  5. Miller v. Estate of SperlingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API