Legal Opinion

Bouvet v. Woodward

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal fiom Wise county, The plaintiff's petition alleged that the defendant “for a valuable consideration, made, executed and delivered” to him, the two promisory notes sued on ; that they are each made payable t<3 him, “or order,” and alleges defendant’s liability to pay him the amounts specified in them by reason of defendant’s promises recited in said notes ; and alleges defendant’s default to make payment, with a prayer for judgment on the notes, and for the foreclosure…

Read the full summary

Appeal fiom Wise county, The plaintiff's petition alleged that the defendant “for a valuable consideration, made, executed and delivered” to him, the two promisory notes sued on ; that they are each made payable t<3 him, “or order,” and alleges defendant’s liability to pay him the amounts specified in them by reason of defendant’s promises recited in said notes ; and alleges defendant’s default to make payment, with a prayer for judgment on the notes, and for the foreclosure of the vendor’s lien on the land described in the petition. This petition conforms sufficiently to the rule of pleading…

1Opinion of the Court

The remaining questions raised being unimportant, and there being no error in the judgment, it is affirmed.

Opinion by

Walker, P. J.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ragland v. WisrockTexas Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API