Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Albatross Tanker Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 69-1542Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Van ARTSDALEN, District Judge.

The plaintiff, a seaman, claims “double penalty wages” from March 16, 1969, to date, pursuant to Title 46 U.S.C.A. § 596.1 The shipowner deducted six days’ pay from the seaman’s wages at the time the seaman received his final pay. The deduction was a forfeiture which the shipowner asserts was properly logged and deducted. Plaintiff contends that (1) he was guilty of no conduct that justified the pay deduction insofar as the log book and admissions of record disclose, and (2) a seaman’s pay forfeiture may be enforced only through…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Collie v. FergussonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Paul J. Heideman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Dewitt Easter v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  5. Shilman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API