Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hoffman v. Borough of Macungie

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 2013Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

*479CONCURRING & DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

I respectfully concur, in part, and dissent, in part, to the well-written Majority opinion in this matter. I generally concur with the Majority’s disposition of the issues raised in these consolidated appeals; however, I dissent to the Majority’s disposition of Mayor Hoffman’s request for attorney’s fees pursuant to Section 2503 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 2503. Based upon the record and the arguments presented by Mayor Hoffman in support of this issue, I do not believe there is any reason for a remand.

Section 2503(7) is a tool for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Township of South Strabane v. PiecknickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Westmoreland County Industrial Development Authority v. Allegheny County Board of Property AssessmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Hoffman v. Borough of MacungieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API