Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Redeker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1886No. 5350PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Tarrant. Tried below before A. M. Carter, Esq., Special Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

Appellee brought this suit in the court below, alleging in substance that appellant, without his consent, employed his minor son, J. W. Redeker, as a brakeman *191on its road, and that while so employed the son was injured through the negligence of appellant, and that thereby appellee lost his services and was put to expense, etc.

The charge of the court is assigned as error, and in so far as it relates to appellee’s right to recover, is as follows:

“You are instructed that the law is, the father is entitled to the services of his minor son during minority, and the minor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Railroad Company v. FortSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. H. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. ShowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Marshall v. DalliberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Silcott v. OglesbyTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Jody Dawkins Fenslage v. Donald Ray Dawkins, F. H. DawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Wills v. Montfair Gas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Washam v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BrickTexas Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API