Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Rockland Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1982No. 81-2-265PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Here, as in Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Dep’t of Transportation v. J. W. Bishop & Co., Inc., and George H. Overmoyer, 497 Pa. 58, 439 A.2d 101 (1981), this Court is presented with a challenge to the common law doctrine of nullum tempus occurrit regí (“time does not run against the king”). As in Bishop and Overmoyer, we reaffirm the well-established rule that statutes of limitations are not applicable to actions brought by the Commonwealth unless the statute expressly so provides. Thus, we vacate the order of the Commonwealth Court and remand for further…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. J. W. Bishop & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Frey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Veterans Loan Authority v. WilkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. J. W. Bishop & Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. City Of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. District of Columbia v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Stroudsburg Area School District v. R.K.R. Associates/ArchitectsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Pennsylvania v. Lake Asphalt & Petroleum Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API