Crowley v. Marshall
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.
In order to satisfy the statute (P. S., c. 215, s. 3) by acceptance and actual receipt of the whole or a part of the goods sold, there must be evidence sufficient to justify a finding that the buyer came into the possession of the goods, and that he assented to the proposition that they were goods he had purchased under the contract in question. Kelsea v. Haines, 41 N. H. 246, 252. Whether there has been such acceptance and receipt is a question of fact, but whether there is any evidence from which the facts can be found is matter of law. Standard Wall Paper Co. v. Towns, 72 N. H. 324, 325,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Garfield v. ParisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Beedy v. Brayman Wooden Ware Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tamkin v. Nelson-Dowling Coal Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
- Datasec v. LockheedDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949