Legal Opinion

Ingram v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1924No. 24368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

The appellant was convicted upon a charge of petty larceny in a justice court, from which she appealed to the circuit court, and the appeal was dismissed, with a writ of procedendo, as appears on the minutes of the court. The record does not show that the appellant was *293called ill the circuit court and given an opportunity to defend against the charge before dismissal of the appeal.

It is contended that the lower court erred in dismissing the appeal, with a writ of procedendo to the justice court, without first having called the defendant, so that she might have opportunity to prosecute her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. Town of HandsboroMississippi Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pool v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  2. McCoy v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Turner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  4. James v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API