Smith v. Smith
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
[After the foregoing statement of the case.] It is not necessary to decide whether the original decree in the case at bar was a final adjudication on the alimony to be paid. If this order is taken to have been a final adjudication upon the *575question of alimony (using that word to mean payments at stated periods), in case there was a change after the date of the decree in the circumstances of the parties or either of them, which in justice required that additional alimony should be paid, the court could- make the order for further alimony. It is not necessary in the case at bar to consider what…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Knapp v. KnappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Southworth v. TreadwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
3Cited by13 opinions
- Coe v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Whitney v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Churchill v. ChurchillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Wilson v. CaswellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Robbins v. RobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.