Armstrong v. Charlotte County Board of County Commissioners
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AND FRONT PAY [Doc. # 68]
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Following a four-day trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Elizabeth Armstrong, on her claims of hostile work environment, disparate treatment, and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. Ann. §§ 760.01-760.11, as well as on her claim of retaliation under Florida’s Workers’ Compensation Law, Fla. Stat. Ann. §§…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Pollard v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- 15 Fair empl.prac.cas. 827, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7842 Patrick James v. Stockham Valves and Fittings Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hudson v. ChertoffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- Carnegie v. Heritage Park Nursing Center LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Ellis v. ChronisterDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Jones v. Hogan Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Miller v. Coventry Holding Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2025