Legal Opinion

Foster v. Price

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 22, 2024No. 1:22-cv-02031Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TABATHA FOSTER, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. 22-CV-2031 (LDH) (LB) NEAL EVAN PRICE and LARNELL PALMER, Defendants. LASHANN DEARCY HALL, United States District Judge: Tabatha Foster (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings the instant action against Neal Evan Price and Larnell Palmer (“Defendants”), pursuant to the Copyright Act,

17 U.S.C. § 101

et seq. Defendant Price, proceeding pro se, moves pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the complaint in its entirety. BACKGROUND1…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. Pdk Labs, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Mitchell K. Friedlander, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. In Re Magnetic Audiotape Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. Marvel Characters, Inc. v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API