Legal Opinion

King v. Davidson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 19, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Arbitrament and Award. ■ Practice in Superior. Court. Before Judge Snead. Richmond Superior Court. April Adjourned Term, 1882. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Speer, Justice.

The plaintiff in error brought suit agáinst the defendant on a promissory note. To this action the defendant pleaded the general issue, and at the April term, 1881, a consent order was agreed on and taken, whereby all questions of law and facts in said case, were referred to the decision of a referee, and F. H. Miller, Esq., was selected as such referee, and the instructions were, “ that he return his decision or award to the (then) next October term of the court, to be entered of record, and stand as the judgment of the court in said cause.” Afterwards the order of reference…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Culbreth v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Train v. EmersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Whaley v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Banigan v. NelmsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. King v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API