Legal Opinion
Reyes ex rel. R.P. v. New York City Department of Education
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 25, 2014No. Docket No. 13-158PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SACK, Circuit Judge:
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) promises each child with a disability a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”),1 20 U.S.C. § 1400(d)(1)(A), which must be “reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits,” Bd. of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 207, 102 S.Ct. 3034, 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). To fulfill this promise, the IDEA allows parents who think that their local school district is not providing their child a FAPE to enroll the child in a private school program unilaterally and thereafter seek reimbursement for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Forest Grove School District v. T. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- M.O. ex rel. D.O. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Hardison v. Bd. of Ed. Oneonta City School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Bd. of Educ. of the Yorktown Cent. Sch. Dist. v. C.S.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Foster v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- J.W. ex rel. Jake W. v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.