Legal Opinion

Tuckness v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1925No. 9299Published

1Opinion

The statement of facts is manifestly but a transcription of the stenographer's notes in question and answer form. It cannot be considered for the reason that it is not in compliance with the statute, Art. 846, C. C. P., as pointed out in the original opinion.

The indictment reads:

"* * * did then and there unlawfully possess a still for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing spirituous, vinous and malt liquors capable of producing intoxication."

Appellant insists that the indictment is duplicitous. It is founded upon Chap. 22, Acts of 38th Leg., 2d Called Session, in which it is made unlawful…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Newsome v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API