Harris v. Bradford
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
This appeal'is from a decree overruling demurrer to the bill as amended after reversal by this court. Harris v. Bradford, 245 Ala. 434, 17 So.2d 145.
On the first appeal the bill was not sustained as to its substantial equity as an irregular foreclosure or as a bill to exercise the. statutory right of redemption. Hence Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 756, and the decisions thereunder are without application. Shields v. Hightower, 216 Ala. 224, 112 So. 834; First Nat. Bank of Opp v. Wise, 238 Ala. 686, 193 So. 131; Alexander v. Landers, 230 Ala. 167, 160 So. 342; Thomasson v. Benson…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Thomas v. SkeggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Shields v. HightowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Alexander v. LandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- First Nat. Bank of Opp v. WiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Odem v. McCormackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Faust v. ParamoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956