Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Shabazz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 2013Published

1DissentPigott, J.

The trial court and the Appellate Division (89 AD3d 529 [1st Dept 2011]) concluded that defendants failed to establish the female codefendant’s unavailability or confirm the reliability of her statement with competent independent evidence. These are the first and fourth elements of the declaration against penal interest exception (People v Settles, 46 NY2d 154, 167 [1978]). The majority memorandum omits any analysis concerning defendants’ failure to meet the first element of that test, which, in my view, is dispositive. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Originally, the female codefendant was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. BrensicNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. PerringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. BranhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API