Hiker v. Broadwell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from Fulton superior court — Judge Bell. October 11, 1922.
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
At a previous hearing of this case this court held that the petition set forth a cause of action. For the nature of the petition see 28 Ga. App. 279 (111 S. E. 62). At the subsequent trial a verdict was directed for the plaintiff, and the defendant excepts. Held-.
1. Regardless of whether our prior decision adjudicated, as insisted by the plaintiff in error, that the averment in relation to the defendant’s possession was essential to the validity of the petition, the averment was indisputably proved at the trial. Notwithstanding the contention of the defendant that “ he was permitted to occupy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bank of the University v. TuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Hancock v. Empire Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- United Leather Co. v. ProudfitSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Lightfoot v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Tumlin v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Highway Department v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Peretzman v. BorochoffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Norman F. Thiex, Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Lohman v. WagnerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.