Legal Opinion

Sturdivant v. Blanchard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 30, 1982No. AO-163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Sturdivant, an inmate in the Florida prison system, asks this court to mandate a judge in the Circuit Court for Escambia County to rule on the merits of a petition for writ of habeas corpus against the Florida Parole and Probation Commission. The petition was denied because petitioner has an adequate remedy under the Administrative Procedure Act.

For the following reasons, we deny this petition for writ of mandamus. First, a writ of mandamus will not issue unless no ordinary remedy would be adequate. Shevin ex rel. State v. Public Service Commission, 333 So.2d 9, 12 (Fla.1976); Holman v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. De Groot v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Dept. of General Serv. v. WillisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Daniels v. Florida Parole & Probation Comm'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Glynn v. McNayrSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  5. Shevin Ex Rel. State v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gawker Media, LLC v. BolleaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Washington v. Am. Homes 4 Rent Props. Six, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. Washington v. Am. Homes 4 Rent Props. Six, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API