Legal Opinion

Constantine v. Gunn

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 20, 1969No. 200037Published

1Opinion of the CourtGarvey, P.J.

The defendant’s plea in abatement to the jurisdiction of the court was denied *101and he claimed a report.1 The action was commenced by a trustee writ described as “one of contract for personal services” with an ad damnum of $1800.00. Count one of the declaration alleges a breach of a written contract in which the defendant agreed to furnish labor and material in construction work on the residence of the plaintiff. Count two is on an “account annexed”.

The defendant asserts the writ should be abated because of non-compliance with the provisions of G-.L. c. 246, § 1.

This statute provides that a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poorvu v. WeisbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Farber v. LubinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Buono v. NardellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. Tennessee Plastics, Inc. v. New England Electric Heating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Whately v. TetraultMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API