Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Preferred Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 10, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Case, J.

Having previously obtained a $10,000 judgment against Michael King for injuries received in an automobile accident, plaintiff sued The Preferred Accident Insurance Company of New York, appellant herein, as King’s insurer and got judgment for $5,797.72, the maximum recoverable under the policy.

Two questions were fully tried out and put to the jury in the instant suit: First, was Michael King an insured under the policy? and, second, if an insured, did he forfeit the indemnification because of lack of co-operation with the insurer in the defense…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArghyrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  2. Juvland v. PlaisanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Pearl Assur. Co., Ltd. v. WattsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Biddle v. BiddleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  5. Berry v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API