Legal Opinion

Gage v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1985No. Docket 74039, 74040, 73749PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

In these cases, we are asked to determine the proper method of computing interest under the 1980 amendment to MCL 600.6013; MSA 27A.6013. The lower courts have reached conflicting results as to whether, and how, judgment interest accrued before June 1, 1980, should be compounded. We hold that there should be no compounding of that interest.

I

Before 1980 PA 134, MCL 600.6013; MSA 27A.6013 provided:

Interest shall be allowed on any money judgment recovered in a civil action, such interest to be calculated from the date of filing the complaint at the rate of 6% per year unless the judgment is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Denham v. BedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Schwartz v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Gherardini v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Gage v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nation v. W D E Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Old Orchard by the Bay Associates v. Hamilton Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Stewart v. IsbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Joiner v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Meehan v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API