Continental Casualty v. Hdqrs. Hair Des., No. Cv 92 0510050 (Jul. 5, 1995)

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This is a motion to preclude an expert from testifying because of failure to comply with the time requirements of PB § 220D.

Knock v. Knock, 224 Conn. 776 (1993) is difficult to apply since although it purports to set forth a distinct "good cause" standard, in the good cause analysis it factors in considerations having to do with prejudice.

I will not grant the motion to preclude here basically because several months remain to trial and no actual prejudice is shown except that which would result…