Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wolfrum v. Wiesman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 22, 2007No. SC 88294PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

Relators Robert Wolfrum and Bevy Beimdiek, employees of the Missouri State Public Defender System, Capital Litigation Division, seek a writ that would prevent Respondent Judge Wiesman from requiring them to try without delay a capital case they are unprepared to take to trial. 1

The preliminary writ of prohibition previously issued in this ease is made absolute, as this Court finds that Respondent should have granted Relators’ request for additional time to prepare for trial.

Background

Relators are appointed counsel for Stanley Johnson. Johnson was serving a prison…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. Chassaing v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  5. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. State ex rel. Missouri Public Defender Commission v. WatersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. State Ex Rel. McKee v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brown Builders Electrical Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  5. STATE EX REL. MISSOURI PUBLIC DEFENDER COMM'N. v. PratteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API