Legal Opinion

Derosa v. Derosa

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 23, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action in equity brought by a wife against her husband for support while living apart from him for justifiable cause. Judgment was for the plaintiff. The defendant confines his brief to two claims: that the plaintiff is barred of recovery because of her refusal to return to him after numerous requests and that she is also barred because of an expressed intention never to return to him.

While the assignments of error attack the finding, this is sustained by the evidence and proper inference therefrom and from other facts found. The facts are these: The parties intermarried November…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. Hein v. HeinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  4. Dow v. DowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Belden v. BeldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kurzatkowski v. KurzatkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. Miano v. ThorneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  4. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Edson v. EdsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API