Beverly v. Blackwood
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior : Court of Tehama County, and from an order denying a new trial,. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to cancel a note and mortgage made and executed by plaintiff to defendant, March 15, 1890, in connection with, and as part of, a transaction by which an exchange of lands between the parties was effected.
The judgment of the trial court was in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The material facts, as found by the lower court, are substantially as follows:
The plaintiff owned 95 acres of land in Santa Clara county, subject to two mortgages, one to Roach for ten thousand dollars, drawing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Newton v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Daggett v. RankinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Steele v. BranchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by7 opinions
- Herdan v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Henck v. Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Lowe v. Los Angeles Suburban Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
- Kleist v. PriemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Poultry Producers of Central California Inc. v. NilssonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.