Legal Opinion

Sorgen v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.

It is sought by this proceeding to obtain a reversal of a judgment of conviction of the plaintiff in error, Ben Sorgen, entered in the criminal division of the municipal court of the city of Cleveland.

The affidavit charging the offense recites: “That on or about the 2nd day of October, A. D. 1929, * * * one Ben Sorgen did unlawfully practice medicine * * * before he the said Ben Sorgen had obtained a certificate from the State Medical Board of Ohio to practice medicine or surgery or any of its branches in the manner required by law, in this, to wit: he the said Ben Sorgen did then and there…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MilamOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Franklin v. FranklinOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. Miclau, Jr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API