Legal Opinion

United States v. Upton

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 11, 1991No. CR-2-90-38(1, 2)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HOLSCHUH, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motions to suppress evidence and the supplemental motions to suppress evidence filed by defendants, John Upton and Kim Montgomery. The government filed mem-oranda contra both the original motions and supplemental motions, and an eviden-tiary hearing was held December 4, 1990. Afterwards, the parties submitted post-hearing briefs.

I

Defendants Upton and Montgomery are charged in a four-count indictment with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, possession with intent to distribute…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles H. LeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  3. State v. DalpiazOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. United States v. BeardDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. United States v. Charles H. LeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API