Legal Opinion

Smith v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 29, 2004No. CA 03-1349PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

Tonya and William Smith appeal from orders denying their motions for summary judgment and granting appellee Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Arkansas, Inc.’s (Farm Bureau) motion for summary judgment. Farm Bureau had sought a declaratory judgment that there was no coverage or duty to defend a claim the Smiths brought against a third party for personal injuries resulting from an explosion in a camper trailer. On appeal, the Smiths assert that (1) the trial court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment because an exclusionary clause contained in Farm…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elam v. First Unum Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Smith v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Castaneda v. Progressive Classic InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Southall v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. of Ark.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Walker v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wintermute v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Spann v. Lovett & Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Aon Risk Services, Inc., of Arkansas v. MeadorsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Yancy v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Griffith v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API