Harris v. Central Power Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFlansburg, J.
This was an action to recover from the defendant Central Power Company damages arising from personal injuries resulting to the plaintiff from collision with a guy wire maintained by the defendant company in a public alley in the city of Kearney. The trial court fbund that there was no showing of negligence on ‘the part of the defendant company and directed a verdict in its favor. From a judgment on this verdict the plaintiff appeals.
The only question presented is whether or not the evidence, construed most favorably to the plaintiff, is sufficient to have presented an issue for the jury on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Louisville Home Telephone Co. v. GasperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Nessen v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Poumeroule v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Raines v. East Tennessee Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Lafayette Telephone Co. v. CunninghamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Danielson v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
- Harris v. Central Power Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1924