Legal Opinion

In re the Application of Slack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 4, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The contracts between the respondents individually and the municipality of which they were officers were illegal and unenforcible under the common law (Smith v. City of Albany, 61 N. Y. 444) and statutes (Village Law, § § 332,333 ). A village trustee acting in his official capacity, should not contract with himself as an individual. The duties and interests of vendor and vendee, employer and employee, are incompatible. The dual obligations should not be attempted by one individual. The acts of the respondents were misdemeanors (Penal Law, § 1868), but did not per se under the statute work a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Certain Citizens, Residents of Village of Lake GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. In re WolfeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Spadanuta v. Incorporated Village of Rockville CentreNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API