Legal Opinion

Wenzel v. Duncan

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

Motion by defendant Incorporated Village of Freeport to dismiss, as to it, plaintiffs’ complaint for legal insufficiency. The infant plaintiff sues for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by her while a passenger in the automobile of the individual defendants on December 3, 1939, when said automobile collided with a traffic stanchion located on Sunrise *555highway, in the village of Freeport; the adult plaintiff, her father, sues for loss of services.

In the first and third causes of action, plaintiffs charge the individual defendants with negligence in the operation of said…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stern v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Waggoner v. JermaineNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Pharm v. LituchyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Blunt v. AikinNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  5. Kushes v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keeley v. Manor Park Apts., SEC. 1Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  2. Walkowicz v. Whitney's, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Wenzel v. DuncanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Hansel v. Gian-FrancheschiNew York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API