Bauerle v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Patricia Bauerle appeals pro se the dismissal on res judicata grounds of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against the City of Tucson, the Tucson City Court, various judges of the Tucson City Court, the State of Arizona, and U.S. District Judge Cindy K Jorgenson. We review the dismissal de novo. Manufactured Home Communities Inc. v. City of San Jose, 420 F.3d 1022, 1025 (9th Cir.2005). We may affirm on any proper ground supported by the record regardless of whether the district court reached the issue or relied on alternative grounds. Wright v. Riveland, 219 F.3d 905, 912 (9th Cir.2000).
R…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Margaret Stewart Jamey L. Paulson William Keith Laura Spencer Lee Callison Stephanie Glowa Terri Gorecki Dan Berryman v. U.S. BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crawley v. City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019