Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roberts v. Hollandsworth

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1980No. 12747Published

1Dissent

TOWLES, Justice Pro Tem.,

dissenting:

From the majority’s determination affirming the trial court’s action in dismissing the above case on the ground that another action was pending, I must dissent.

As pointed out by the majority opinion, an action was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, was dismissed by the court on motion for summary judgment, and an appeal was filed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

About the same time the appeal was filed, the plaintiff appellants herein filed an action in the state district court involving the same set of facts and the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Hunt v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  5. Merritt v. American Steel-Barge Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API