Legal Opinion

Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1940No. 25990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

announced the decision of the court:

This is a motion by appellees to dismiss this appeal or in the alternative for extension of time to file briefs. The ground for dismissal urged is that the appeal was not perfected within sixty days after the entry of the order or judgment of the trial court, as required by section 69 of the Public Utilities act governing appeals from orders of the Illinois Commerce Commission. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939, chap. 111⅔, par. 73.

Appellant replies that the Civil Practice act has superseded section 69 of the Utilities act, and that by section 76(1) of the Civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hudson v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People ex rel. Hines v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  4. City of Breese v. AbelIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Gardener School District No. 112 v. County Board of School TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Board of Education of Gardener School District No. 112 v. County Board of School TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Summers v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API