Legal Opinion

Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 20, 2001No. CX-99-777, C7-99-1210Published

1Opinion of the Court

633 N.W.2d 517 (2001)

PROGRAMMED LAND, INC., et al., Respondents,

v.

Patrick O'CONNOR, in his capacity as Treasurer and Auditor for Hennepin County, et al., petitioners, Appellants, and

Harold Christian, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Respondent,

v.

Thomas Novak, in his capacity as Treasurer and Auditor for Dakota County, et al., Appellants.

Nos. CX-99-777, C7-99-1210.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 20, 2001.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.

Respondent taxpayers seek to recover real property tax overpayments…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. In Re Taxes for 1961 on Real Estate Owned by Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API