Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. 109 Acres of Land

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided October 7, 1975No. CIV-4-74-40PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

This is an eminent domain proceeding involving the taking of private property for public use by the federal government, functioning herein through the relator the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). Private property may not be taken for public use without just compensation. Constitution, Fifth Amendment.

Under its inherent power so to do, and prior to the effective date of the Federal Rules of Evidence, esp. Rule 706(b) thereof, the Court appointed an independent value expert witness to appraise the land taken and to testify before the jury his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas F. Lee and Wife Ola Mae Lee, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. United States of America Upon the Relation and for the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Council J. PressnellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  3. United States v. 818.76 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. 101.80 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. 101.80 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Idaho County, Idaho, Joseph Schwartz and Lorena Rose Schwartz, United States of America v. 35.54 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Idaho County, Idaho, Ora Hazelbaker, a WidowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Proper Agency to Make Payment for the Compensation of Court-Appointed Expert Witnesses in Cases Handled by the Department of Justice, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API