Legal Opinion
Goodman v. Stalfort, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 26, 1976No. Civ. 251-72PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIUNNO, District Judge.
This suit, brought on diversity grounds, seeks damages for personal injuries sustained in the use of an inflammable fluid marketed for the specific purpose of igniting charcoal in an outdoor grill.
The defendant Inland Oil and Chemical Corp. (Inland) was the supplier who initially furnished the fluid to Stalfort, in bulk. The fluid was sold to one or the other of the Stalfort companies, which packaged the fluid in cans for defendant Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. (A & P), which in turn marketed the product under its brand for retail sale. Plaintiff Goodman…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Gudnestad v. Seaboard Coal Dock Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Maiorino v. Weco Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- George Siegler Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Bush v. New Jersey & New York Transit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. v. Camden Fire Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977