Legal Opinion

Greenwood, A. & W. Ry. v. Strang

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided December 4, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIM COTTON, Circuit Judge.

These two cases have been consolidated, and were heard together. The first-named case was instituted in the court of common pleas for Barnwell county, and has been duly removed into this court. The second case was a bill filed in this court by W. B. Strang, Jr., & Co., in behalf of themselves jand all other creditors. The facts are these: W. B. Strang, Jr., and Co., are railroad contractors. They entered into a contract with the Greenwood, Anderson & Western Railroad Company to construct a road from Seivern to Greenwood, and further to carry on the road to-Batesburg,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Smith v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Brooks v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Wiggins v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
  5. Buncombe County Commissioners v. TommeySupreme Court of the United States · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pittsburg Equitable Meter Co. v. CaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  2. City of Shreveport v. Kansas City, S. & G. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. Winston & Co. v. Georgia & F. R. R.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API