Legal Opinion

The W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Wilkes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 7, 1938No. 4-5230PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.

The. appellant entered into a contract with appellee, James A. Wilkes, under which Wilkes purchased merchandise on a credit during 1932. When tile contract expired Wilkes owed appellant on January 1, 1933', $452.39. They then entered into a renewal contract. Appellees, E. H. McKay and Garland Hamm, entered into a contract with appellant as sureties' for Wilkes. The contract was terminated during the month of May, 1933, at which time Wilkes owed appellant a balance of'$449.17.. Under the contract, the appellant agreed to sell quantities of its products to Wilkes at the current wholesale prices…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Christmas v. RaleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Foster v. Universal C. I. T. Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  3. Gowen v. SullinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. Joe Smith v. David H. Arrington Oil & GasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Pate v. GoyneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API