Bollinger v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Nobles county to recover possession of a promissory note for $500. The case was tried before P. E. Brown, J., and a jury, which was directed to return a verdict in favor of plaintiff. ' From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed. The foreign statute should have been pleaded. Myers v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co., 69 Minn. 476; 9 Enc.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Nobles county to recover possession of a promissory note for $500. The case was tried before P. E. Brown, J., and a jury, which was directed to return a verdict in favor of plaintiff. ' From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed. The foreign statute should have been pleaded. Myers v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co., 69 Minn. 476; 9 Enc. Pl. & Pr. 542; National v. Lang, 2 N. D. 66; Bliss, Code Pl. § 287; Thatcher v. Morris, 11 N. Y. 437; Kittle v. De Lamater, 3 Neb. 325; Maxwell, Code Pl. 89. The sale was at Milwaukee. 11 Am. & Eng.…
1Opinion of the CourtMitci-Iell, J.
This was an action to recover the possession of a promissory note. The undisputed evidence was that in August, 1893, an “agent” of the Schlitz Brewing Company, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, interviewed the plaintiff at Rock Rapids, Iowa, the place of his residence, and suggested that he engage in the business of selling beer at that place, and solicited ■ him to buy beer for that purpose from the Schlitz Brewing Company, advising that it be shipped in the fictitious name of “Paul Bodenbach,” in order to avoid his getting into trouble for violating the laws of Iowa. Thereupon the plaintiff executed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Graves v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gutterson v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State v. GruberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911