Katzenstein v. Amsterdam Equities, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1ConcurrenceVan Voorhis, J.
The courts retain control over, procedural stipulations by the parties in actions and proceedings, and refuse to recognize them where they are inimical to the orderly administration of justice (Goldstein v. Goldsmith, 243 App. Div. 268). In deciding this appeal, it is not necessary to pass upon whether the courts ought to approve a stipulation dispensing with a statutory requirement that is so necessary to intelligent judicial review, and to other aspects of the administration of justice, as the making by the trial court of a statement of the facts which it deems essential to its decision,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldstein v. GoldsmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Hall v. BestonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Shaffer v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Shaul v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
- Shaul v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.