James Maxwell v. U.S. Bank National Association
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
The plaintiff, James Hollowman Maxwell, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his case on the grounds that it was barred by res judicata. U.S. Bank and MERS, the defendants, argue that the district court properly dismissed the case because the claims were barred by the res judicata effect of two earlier cases brought by Maxwell which were dismissed with prejudice. Because we agree that res ju-dicata bars these claims, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
I
This case arises out of the foreclosure proceedings involving Maxwell’s home. In 2006, Maxwell executed a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Davis v. Dallas Area Rapid TransitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Othar Russell v. Sunamerica Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alberetta G. Williams v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
- Annette S. Newton v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
- Blair v. Yum! BrandsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Boykin v. VincentDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
- Ditech Holding CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.