Legal Opinion

Harrison v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 1991No. 49A02-9006-PC-310PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARPNACK, Judge.

David Harrison appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand to the post-conviction court.

Harrison raises three issues on appeal which we restate as two issues:

1. Whether the trial court committed reversible error by not considering as evidence testimony and affidavits of jurors regarding the existence and nature of their contact with the bailiff

2. Whether the post-conviction court's finding that Harrison did not meet his burden of demonstrating ineffective assistance of counsel was contrary to law

We…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Ortiz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  5. United States v. Mary Josephine VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Azania v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Butler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. WintersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Driver v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Jewell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API