Legal Opinion

Faust v. Carson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1944No. 36,045PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*480The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action to recover money. Judgment was for the defendants sustaining a demurrer to the petition of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs appeal.

The outcome of the litigation depends in a large measure on what was done in a former action between Thomas Faust and these same defendants. The pleadings in that action were attached to the petition in this case.

After alleging the relationship of the plaintiffs and that the defendants were the administratrix of the estate and the heirs of W. G. Carson, the petition alleged that plaintiffs were the owners…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manley v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. Anthony v. HaldermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Holmes v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Rost v. HeykaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Kerr v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Hess v. HessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Simmons v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Simmons v. MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH & ACCIDENT ASS'NNebraska Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API