Legal Opinion
Regency Pheasant Run Ltd. v. Karem
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1993No. 93-SC-130-TGPublished
1Opinion of the Court
860 S.W.2d 755 (1993)
REGENCY PHEASANT RUN LTD., et al., Petitioners,
v.
The Honorable Edmund P. "Pete" KAREM, et al., Respondents.
No. 93-SC-130-TG.
Supreme Court of Kentucky.
July 1, 1993.
Dennis J. Stilger, Louisville, for petitioners.
Edmund P. Karem, Sitlinger, McGlincy, Steiner & Theiler, Richard J. Emmett, William McAnulty, Holland N. McTyeire, Greenebaum, Doll & McDonald, Kenneth E. Dunn, Louisville, for respondents.
OPINION DENYING THE ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF PROHIBITION
STEPHENS, Chief Justice.
The issue presented in this case is whether a practicing attorney who is a retired judge can be…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte Auditor of Public AccountsKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
- Speed v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
- Shumaker v. PaxtonKentucky Supreme Court · 1981
- Kentucky Utilities Co. v. South East Coal Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Kratzer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.