State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

It is contended in the brief for the relatrix that the Industrial Commission should have taken the date of the last accident (May 6, 1931) as it was the more probable cause of the injury resulting in "the disease and death" and that she is entitled to receive the most favorable possible interpretation of the question as a matter of law.

Mandamus will lie to compel the exercise of discretion but not to control it unless there be an abuse of discretion.State, ex rel. Baker, v. Hanefeld, Dir., 134 Ohio St. 540,18 N.E.2d 404.

Although it is alleged that the Industrial Commission exercised its…