Legal Opinion

Bohmann v. Perrett

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 7, 1922Published

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

The defendants assign error in the charge of the court, and in its refusal to charge as requested by them. They claim that the effect of the charge as given involved holding, as matter of law, either that the plaintiff was not the owner of the motorcycle, or that, if he was the owner, the vehicle was properly registered, even though in fact the plaintiff had not at the time of the accident actually procured registration in his own name, nor procured and affixed number-plates.

The defendants claim that the agreement, Exhibit C, in form a lease with privilege of purchase, is in fact, as between…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stroud v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Kiely v. RagaliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Jester v. NaplesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Lambert Hoisting Engine Co. v. CarmodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API