McCullough v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
'The offense is burglary with one prior ■conviction alleged for enhancement; the punishment, nine years.
Appellant’s first ground of error is that the “trial court erred in refusing to quash the indictment (because) it was not signed by the foreman (of the grand jury) as required by Article 21.02, Section 9, V.A.C.C.P.” No motion to quash was presented to the trial court as required by Article 27.10, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P. We further observe that such signature is not essential to the validity of the indictment. Ex parte Landers, Tex.Cr.App., 366 S.W.2d 567. We find no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- De La Rosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Singleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Ex Parte LandersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Root v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Riney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Payton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Parks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.